🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, the game developers introduced a fresh game mode called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this option resembles the regular Breakthrough setup but includes a few key changes:

• Each team has only eight real players, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by real players grant full XP, while AI activities provide reduced XP.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Player tags, achievements, and stat tracking have been turned off.

In short, this mode delivers on its name: it's a laid-back take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it provides more options for players looking for different ways to have fun with the game. However, if video games have taught us anything, it is that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of BF6 players are mad.

Community Responses: Anger to Praise

"People want real players. Don't repeat the mistakes of your rivals," states a response to the official announcement. "Absolutely shocking idea," comments another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player notes, "I have no idea where we are going with this title," and someone else details all the issues they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We do not require this bot mode."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers sharing how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's enjoyable to practice, human participants keep it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," reads a forum post. "The community doesn't understand that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title 24/7. Allow them to strike a balance," states a different comment. One reply on Twitter explains that as they're "a parent gamer with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," and another applauds the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Valid Criticisms and Player Feedback

All that said, players have constructive reasons to criticize Casual Breakthrough. Some users have highlighted that it could increase wait times even longer for other modes because of the sheer number of options currently available. On a similar note, some areas already encounter mostly bots in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of real players, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer complete rewards, even against bots, but that got canned when they attempted to eliminate bot farms from the mode. So this new playlist feels like the community compromising in the middle, according to a Reddit comment. A different user describes this mode as the developers "making a mistake significantly, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Be Made?

Should the development team has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it is that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Assignments that were overly hard got fixed rapidly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, should analytics shows this recent mode is underperforming to their expectations, they won't be shy to make further modifications.